2013 Reports & Tribunal Discusion

Zac Milbank wrote:Glenelg captain Ty Allen was reported for striking South Adelaide’s John McDonald. The SANFL Review Panel withdrew the report – it deemed Allen was attempting to tackle and accidental contact was made to McDonald with his inner arm.

Port Adelaide captain James Meiklejohn was reported for making forceful front-on contact with Norwood’s Darren Pfeiffer. The SANFL Review Panel withdrew the report – it deemed contact was made to Pfeiffer’s shoulder while Meiklejohn stood his ground.

eartotheground wrote:A strange report from the Friday night reserves game, to be heard tonight - West's runner for the night, Adam Hartlett, reported for abusive language, by Eleni Glouftsis.

His poor tribunal record could be a factor here.

brodlach wrote:Some of the umpiring decisions in the reserves were as bad as you can get, no wonder Hartlett was frustrated

Thiele wrote:

brodlach wrote:Some of the umpiring decisions in the reserves were as bad as you can get, no wonder Hartlett was frustrated

Totally agree

SANFL Media Release wrote:
TRIBUNAL REPORTS:

Aaron Fielke (West Adelaide FC) - offered a 1 Match Penalty by the SANFL’s Incident Review Panel for striking Norwood’s Jace Bode. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Shane Birss (West Adelaide FC) – offered a 2 Match Penalty for making contact with an injured player. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Big Phil wrote:A couple of reports from the SANFL tribunal effecting Westies...

SANFL Media Release wrote:
TRIBUNAL REPORTS:

Aaron Fielke (West Adelaide FC) - offered a 1 Match Penalty by the SANFL’s Incident Review Panel for striking Norwood’s Jace Bode. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Shane Birss (West Adelaide FC) – offered a 2 Match Penalty for making contact with an injured player. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Not sure about the Fielke incident, but you can clearly see what Birss is cited for, at about the 6:10 minute mark of 'The Recovery Session', as below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G-U4N04512E

bigclock wrote:

Big Phil wrote:A couple of reports from the SANFL tribunal effecting Westies...

SANFL Media Release wrote:
TRIBUNAL REPORTS:

Aaron Fielke (West Adelaide FC) - offered a 1 Match Penalty by the SANFL’s Incident Review Panel for striking Norwood’s Jace Bode. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Shane Birss (West Adelaide FC) – offered a 2 Match Penalty for making contact with an injured player. He has until 9am Tuesday 23 April to decide whether he will contest his charge.

Not sure about the Fielke incident, but you can clearly see what Birss is cited for, at about the 6:10 minute mark of 'The Recovery Session', as below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=G-U4N04512E

Extremely average conduct by a 'senior' player. One of the lowest acts to hit an injured player. The term 'p!ssweak' comes to mind.

Big Phil wrote:Not sure about the Fielke incident, but you can clearly see what Birss is cited for, at about the 6:10 minute mark of 'The Recovery Session', as below:

Adelaide Hawk wrote:

Big Phil wrote:Not sure about the Fielke incident, but you can clearly see what Birss is cited for, at about the 6:10 minute mark of 'The Recovery Session', as below:

The Fielke incident was for striking Bode. It certainly could have been avoided and deserved a penalty of some kind. I didn't see the Birss contact and wasn't sure why some people around me took a dislike to Birss ... until I just saw the footage. Ordinary stuff, but you see that sort of crap go on at AFL level. Scott brothers on Riewoldt springs to mind.

testy wrote:

Adelaide Hawk wrote:

Big Phil wrote:Not sure about the Fielke incident, but you can clearly see what Birss is cited for, at about the 6:10 minute mark of 'The Recovery Session', as below:

The Fielke incident was for striking Bode. It certainly could have been avoided and deserved a penalty of some kind. I didn't see the Birss contact and wasn't sure why some people around me took a dislike to Birss ... until I just saw the footage. Ordinary stuff, but you see that sort of crap go on at AFL level. Scott brothers on Riewoldt springs to mind.

I think the difference with the Reiwoldt incident was that he was running of the ground and not laying on the ground injured, but injured is injured.

ca wrote:Birss in my opinion is getting off very lightly, not good. It will be interestingbto see what happens at the tribunal with Bassett, Collins and Bode. You never want coaches/officials and players making physical contact however slight so I think Bode and Bassett wil cop a penalty and deservedly so. Its hard to know how they will penalise the coach.

firstblood wrote:Bode should cop a heavy penalty for punching an opposition coach in the head from behind in which most would call a cowardly attack.

firstblood wrote:

ca wrote:Birss in my opinion is getting off very lightly, not good. It will be interestingbto see what happens at the tribunal with Bassett, Collins and Bode. You never want coaches/officials and players making physical contact however slight so I think Bode and Bassett wil cop a penalty and deservedly so. Its hard to know how they will penalise the coach.

Bode should cop a heavy penalty for punching an opposition coach in the head from behind in which most would call a cowardly attack.

firstblood wrote:

ca wrote:Birss in my opinion is getting off very lightly, not good. It will be interestingbto see what happens at the tribunal with Bassett, Collins and Bode. You never want coaches/officials and players making physical contact however slight so I think Bode and Bassett wil cop a penalty and deservedly so. Its hard to know how they will penalise the coach.

Bode should cop a heavy penalty for punching an opposition coach in the head from behind in which most would call a cowardly attack.