is this fair ?

i heard on the radio tonight that all categories of crows memberships will entitle them to go to Crows SANFL games for free mmmmmmm...............

does this cheapen the competition further ?

is it good for football that a 'few' may wander in for a look ?

if it is good for them then why can't it be good for Port as well ? (Port have to have 2 separate memberships even under the current situation)

does it make the 8 other clubs membership packages too expensive ?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

personally 'they promised' an extra 4,000 people (i don't buy that for one moment) but if those 4,000 rocked up for free who benefits ? extra atmosphere, while food & drinks would be better than average, presuming they don't all take their lunch etc with them

This was known previously, and as far as I am concerned I have no problem with it.

I have a family member that is a Cows season ticket holder who spends over $500 for all of there home games so why should she pay to see there B Grade.

As for port, they are still part of the SANFL even though they are the power"s B grade, this will all change to be in line with the cows next year.

testy wrote:This was known previously

''known previously'' by you & probably others but not ''known previously'' by me, this afternoon was the first i heard of it

bayman wrote:

testy wrote:This was known previously

''known previously'' by you & probably others but not ''known previously'' by me, this afternoon was the first i heard of it

So sorry you weren't aware of it, so get over it .

It was reported in the local rag some time in the past but not sure how long ago it was. So close to the new season I would have thought it was well known.

If I was a Cows supporter (and I hate them) I wouldn't be paying to watch a B Grade team.

testy wrote:

bayman wrote:

testy wrote:This was known previously

''known previously'' by you & probably others but not ''known previously'' by me, this afternoon was the first i heard of it

So sorry you weren't aware of it, so get over it .

i'm sorry i didn't know, but i'm not impressed with the short, nasty sarcastic comment, getting to be a bit like safooty, if this type of quip (or worse) continues it will end up the same

btw all i did was ask some questions anyway

bayman wrote:

testy wrote:

bayman wrote:

testy wrote:This was known previously

''known previously'' by you & probably others but not ''known previously'' by me, this afternoon was the first i heard of it

So sorry you weren't aware of it, so get over it .

i'm sorry i didn't know, but i'm not impressed with the short, nasty sarcastic comment, getting to be a bit like safooty, if this type of quip (or worse) continues it will end up the same

I have nothing to do with the other site you named on here and I apologise with the answer to your question on this topic. I thought and obviously I was wrong , that this was common knowledge.

I have no intention of being sarcastic, I hate it, it is the lowest form of wit there is, but thought you were a bit above that , nasty you have to be joking.

testy wrote:If I was a Crows supporter (and I hate them) I wouldn't be paying to watch a B Grade team.

Are you like 3?

sapaul wrote:

testy wrote:If I was a Crows supporter (and I hate them) I wouldn't be paying to watch a B Grade team.

Are you like 3?

I am sorry but LIKE I don't understand your question.